March-April 2010

Seattle Takes Natural Drainage to a High Point

Using street rights of way to manage stormwater

Article Tools

Create a Link to this Article

Photo: SvR Design Company

By Margaret Buranen

1 Comments

Seattle’s Natural Drainage System (NDS) consists of stormwater management projects that use low-impact development (LID) strategies to meet multiple goals within street rights of way (ROWs), which account for 25% of Seattle’s total land surface. The projects work by infiltrating stormwater runoff, slowing it temporarily or lessening its volume, filtering, or removing pollutants through the use of soils and native plants, replacing impervious surfaces with pervious, and adding native vegetation.

NDS projects are “green,” using natural elements to mimic the ways of nature that have been lost to urbanization. Its features include open spaces, vegetated swales, stormwater cascades, and small wetlands ponds. Along with the plants and trees, there must be deep, healthy amended soils to support their growth.

While NDS projects may be better for the environment than traditional stormwater management structures, in the long term, they are usually as cost effective or even cheaper than traditional hard infrastructure as well. They also offer the advantage of being more attractive to the public than utilitarian infrastructure. One way in which they achieve this is by providing wildlife habitats.

A Seattle city plan developed the initial concept for the Street Edge Alternatives (SEA) Streets, Seattle’s first NDS project. Darla Inglis of the Low Impact Development Center’s Central Coast office in San Luis Obispo, CA, and Tracy Tackett, P.E., the LID program manager for Seattle Public Utilities (SPU), added to the concept strategies to reduce stormwater peaks and volumes that were being discharged to salmon-bearing creeks.

A Redeveloped Housing Project
Seattle has five NDS projects. The largest and most elaborate is called High Point after its location, which has a rich history. In the 1940s, thousands of workers moved to Seattle to work for Boeing or in the shipyards in support of the war effort. Housing was needed for them and their families, and 700 duplexes were quickly constructed. The large temporary housing project, called High Point, was on the western side of Seattle. From there, residents could enjoy fine views of the downtown skyline and Mount Rainier.

Photo: SvR Design Company
A porous concrete street and vegetated
swale

After the war, when defense plant production slowed, occupancy of the duplexes dropped. In 1952, High Point was converted to a public housing project. Eventually it became an obsolete, isolated neighborhood with rundown buildings and many vacancies.

Now renovated, High Point is a key to the renewal of West Seattle. With 129 acres, it is the single largest redevelopment in the city since World War II. It’s also the largest sustainable mixed-use, mixed-income urban neighborhood in the US. Construction of the first phase began in 2003 and the second phase was finished in the spring of 2009.

High Point is the result of a collaborative effort of the Seattle Housing Authority (SHA) and SPU. The US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and other city of Seattle departments were also involved.

 The project’s success demanded a high level of cooperation from all parties involved. Integrating an innovative drainage system into a predominantly townhouse-style housing development had no precedent. Discussions and planning took approximately two years. The agencies agreed to share funding sources to meet the total $550 million cost. Some federal funds—Hope VI funds, intended to redevelop urban housing projects—were used.

“High Point took the complexity of managing multiple goals in the limited right-of-way space to a much higher level than we encountered on the lower-density NDS projects,” explains Tackett. “There were more competing needs—such as underground power, as well as a desire for playable space in the planting strips—in the High Point project, and a narrower right-of-way width. Accommodating all the demands while achieving the stormwater goal of infiltrating the water-quality design event was the most
challenging.”

As an example of the effort required by all parties involved, Tackett recalls “the meeting of approximately 15 folks to decide if a 5-inch curb instead of a 6-inch curb would be permitted.”

Advertisement

Peg Staeheli, ASLA, LEED AP, principal with SvR Design Company, was the landscape architect for High Point. She agrees on takeaway lessons from the project: “It is a study of inches—and true integration of professional disciplines with the owner [SHA] and the Public agency [the city of Seattle]. The design team kept the focus on the place for the people. It has to meet that criterion first; it is not all about stormwater. We wanted great streets for people and little nooks to visit and play. We used the spaces for multiple functions, and it paid off.”

For Staeheli, the most difficult part of the project was a lack of precedent. “In 2001, there were not any examples at this scale and no rules. This was before the Puget Sound Partnership came out with guidelines.” She also notes that the construction phase was tough, with a lot of lessons learned. Next Page >

What Do You Think?

Post a Comment

sarasotasun

March 29th, 2010 4:53 PM PT

The housing units were in reality duplexes and fourplexes. Your excellent article should reflect the facts correctly: "... and 700 duplexes were quickly constructed."

Post a Comment

Not a subscriber? Sign Up
 
 
*  
 




 

Get Stormwater E-mail Updates!

Get weekly news and updates through our Stormwater e-mail newsletter!