The Stormwater Blogs

The Blogger

Jeff Herr National Stormwater Design Leader at Brown and Caldwell

The Future of Managed Stormwater

June 2nd, 2008 1:18pm PST

Developing Stormwater Treatment Systems to Remove Nitrogen

Posted By Jeff Herr 2 Comments
As property is converted from natural to developed land use, impervious area is added and remaining pervious areas may be compacted by construction equipment traffic. These changes reduce the potential for rainfall to infiltrate into the ground and increase the post-development volume of stormwater runoff discharged from the site. In addition to an increase in runoff volume, human activities associated with development routinely increase the concentration of nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus), suspended solids, heavy metals, and many other pollutants in stormwater runoff. The combination of increased runoff volume and pollutant concentrations results in significant increases in stormwater pollutant loads to receiving surface waters. Eutrification of lakes, rivers, and estuaries is a common result of increased nutrient loadings from stormwater runoff. Eutrification can degrade water quality, negatively impact fish and wildlife, complicate treatment for water supplies, and limit human recreation. The primary productivity of the receiving water is normally limited by phosphorus, nitrogen, or both. Significant nitrogen and/or phosphorus load reductions (50%+) are sometimes needed to satisfy Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) program stormwater load reduction requirements or to improve surface water quality. Our first choice for reducing stormwater pollutant loads should be stormwater volume reduction at or near the source. Nitrogen and phosphorus load reductions greater than 80% can be accomplished using infiltration practices and storage and reuse. In many areas it is not possible to use infiltration practices, due to the presence of low-permeability soils, high groundwater conditions, or regulatory restrictions. Stormwater storage and reuse may be cost prohibitive due to the required storage and associated infrastructure or may also be limited by regulatory issues. Chemical coagulation and settling of stormwater can consistently achieve a 90%+ load reduction for phosphorus but only 30% to 40% for nitrogen. Other traditional stormwater treatment methods, primarily wet detention, can remove up to about 70% of the phosphorus, but only 30% to 40% of the nitrogen. Wetland treatment, which requires a significant land area, can be very effective in removing nitrogen when the influent concentration is much higher than typical stormwater (well above 1 mg/L). Similar to chemical treatment for phosphorus removal, innovative stormwater treatment technologies are needed which can consistently remove 50% to 90% of stormwater nitrogen loads. This is complicated by the relatively low concentrations of nitrogen in stormwater as compared to wastewater and highly variable stormwater flow rates. What are your ideas for removing nitrogen from stormwater runoff?

 

What Do You Think?

Post a Comment

rlemoine

June 11th, 2008 9:43 PM PT

I am in the preliminary design of a project to capture the first flush from an existing urbanized area. I am looking at wetland type treatment to achieve water quality needed for reusing the captured water. However, as the above article mentioned it requires some land area. In an urban setting that can be a significant restriction. Urban areas also need land area for open space, often referred to as "Green Infrastructure". The design of sub-surface flow wetlands allows the same land area to serve multiple purposes. The surface area can be used for a passive recreation, while the subsurface rhizome zone(root and micro-organisms) of the park landscape removes the pollutants. The nuisance, and the health and safety risks are eliminated since the polluted water is kept below the surface, away from any possibility of human contact. If designed with a sufficient hydraulic resdence time, the effluent should be clean enough for reuse in water features like water gardens, small waterfalls, and fountains. The results can be a mutual benefit for both the community and the enviornmental. It is vital for sustainability that financial resourses expended for environmental quality also provide improved community and social benefits. Good designs for public spaces need to incorporate diverse and multiple purposes.

Gordon

July 2nd, 2008 1:48 PM PT

Reaching 80% removal for nitrogen is very difficult with one BMP. It will take a treatment train of several BMPS - wet pond + dry retention or dry detention + roadside swales + inlet traps + LID etc. And how do you calculate all of that? Which is why Florida is turning to meeting pre vs post pollutant loadings for each site instead of the presumptive 80% rule. It is much like (only easier) meeting pre vs post discharge rates with hydraulic modeling. Turns out that meeting pre vs post pollutant loads often gives less than and 80% requirement. Time to rewrite the local regulations.

Post a Comment

Not a subscriber? Sign Up
 
 
*  
 




 

Get Stormwater E-mail Updates!

Get weekly news and updates through our Stormwater e-mail newsletter!