The Stormwater Blogs

The Blogger

Janice Kaspersen Janice Kaspersen Stormwater Editor

More from this blogger

  1. Dam Breach in Iowa
  2. Two Weeks to StormCon
  3. Mosquitoes and Malaria
  4. More Mosquitoes
  5. Storms in the Gulf
  6. Seeking StormCon Moderators
  7. Never Flooded Before
  8. Storms in the Midwest
  9. Restoring the Penobscot
  10. Hurricanes and Oil
  11. The Uninvited
  12. Half of Our Trees Are Missing
  13. A Hairy Solution
  14. Oil in the Gulf
  15. A Multitalented Plant
  16. Where It Falls
  17. Floating BMPs
  18. Regulating Copper in Brake Pads
  19. EPA Addresses Water Contaminants
  20. Getting Along With the Neighbors
  21. Local Voices in Washington
  22. Out of Sight
  23. Sentinel Species
  24. Collection System
  25. Living Underground
  26. Keeping Stormwater Onsite in LA
  27. Appealing the New Flood Maps
  28. EPA Sets Nutrient Limits for Florida
  29. Some Like It Hot
  30. Maintenance The Unglamorous Necessity
  31. Put the LID on Stormwater
  32. Federal Responsibility for Katrina Flooding
  33. Certifying Performance
  34. EPA's Construction Effluent Guidelines Released
  35. StormCon Abstracts Due December 2
  36. Reclassified
  37. Reusing Runoff
  38. More Than Just Pipes
  39. Two Announcements from EPA
  40. Separation Anxiety
  41. Federal Funding for Local Projects
  42. Undoing Progress
  43. StormCon 2010 Call for Papers
  44. A Decimal Point Makes a Difference
  45. Lovely as a Tree
  46. Stimulus Funds and Stormwater
  47. Thanks to the StormCon Session Moderators!
  48. Live From StormCon..
  49. StormCon '09 More You Should Know About
  50. Counting Beach Closures
  51. Still Growing
  52. Density Done Well
  53. A Combination Problem
  54. One Driveway at a Time
  55. Underground
  56. Making Sure Infrastructure Doesn't Become a Hazard
  57. A Beach Comes Back
  58. With a Grain of Salt
  59. Blocking Out the Storm
  60. LID in Washington State
  61. Florida Gains Land in Public-Private Partnership
  62. A High-Density Debate
  63. Stormwater Management in Plain Sight
  64. Charging More for Potential Pollutants
  65. At Home in the Watershed
  66. We Have Met the Polluter - He Is Us
  67. Mobile Car Wash Runoff
  68. Red River Rising
  69. Summer School
  70. Rain Barrels, Anyone
  71. Getting Serious About the Weather
  72. Taking the Pulse of Utilities
  73. Not Your Ordinary Utility Debate
  74. How Dangerous Is Chitosan, Really Do We Need Certification
  75. Debating Dollars
  76. Demonstrating Green
  77. Paperless Stormwater
  78. Looking for Shovel-Ready Projects
  79. Online Erosion Control Training - Let Us Know What You Think
  80. No Relief Yet for the Northwest
  81. Happy Holidays From Stormwater
  82. Remedying Retention Pond Dangers
  83. New Funding on the Way
  84. The Case of the Missing Manhole Cover
  85. StormCon '09 Abstracts Are Due December 3
  86. A New Plan in the Everglades
  87. Down the Drain
  88. Gunk in the Ocean Our Problem
  89. Save the Date December 3 Is Closer Than You Think
  90. Watershed-Based Permitting
  91. Looking Outside Our Own Backyard
  92. The Clean Watersheds Needs Survey
  93. Show Me the Money, If You Can Find It
  94. The Safety Issue
  95. StormCon '09 Call for Papers
  96. Worse Weather Or Does It Just Seem That Way
  97. Gustav a Reminder of What's Left To Do
  98. Recovering After the Storm
  99. Who Owns the Rain
  100. BMPs and the Bigger Picture
  101. How Are Your Pipes
  102. Regulations We've Got Those Covered, Too
  103. You Asked for BMPs - We've Got 'Em
  104. Simplifying Public Outreach
  105. New Terminology
  106. Buying Time and Space for the Everglades
  107. The Worst Is Over
  108. Midwest Flooding - Could This Have Happened Differently
  109. EPA's Message to Homebuilders
  110. StormCon '08 Is Less Than Two Months Away
  111. Welcome to our new Website!
  112. The State of Water Quality
view all

SW Editor's Blog

January 4th, 2010 8:08am PST

"Skip the Bag, Save the River"

Posted By Janice Kaspersen 1 Comment

This new year brings with it a multitude of new laws, ranging from a ban on texting while driving (Illinois) to a requirement for minors to wear seatbelts in all-terrain vehicles (Oregon) to limits on the amounts of trans fats in restaurant food (California) to smoking prohibitions in restaurants and bars (North Carolina) to restrictions on teenagers’ use of tanning beds (Texas).

In Washington DC, a new law requires stores that sell food or alcohol to charge a user fee on paper and plastic bags—5 cents per bag. The law is supposed to encourage residents to bring reusable bags with them when they shop. This in itself isn’t unusual—several cities have enacted or attempted something similar, such as San Francisco’s outright ban on plastic bags—but the arguments for such laws usually have to do with limiting the use of nonrenewable resources, saving energy, or reducing the amount of material that ends up in landfills. In this case, the driver is water quality.

Most of the revenue from the city’s new law, which is expected to amount to $3.6 million dollars in 2010, will fund the cleanup of the Anacostia River. (Businesses charging the fee will retain a percentage of it.) The city’s Department of the Environment says that 21% of the trash in the river, and 47% of that in the Anacostia’s tributaries, consists of plastic shopping bags.

The city is drawing a clear connection between the health of the river and the bag fee, explaining how the bags make their way into storm drains and eventually to the waterway. Slogans promoting the new law include “Skip the Bag, Save the River.”

Some residents and business owners have complained about the fee, but as it went into effect, many stores were distributing free reusable bags to their customers.

Does your city or state have a similar ban or fee on bags, or is it considering one? What would likely be the main motivation for it—water quality or some other environmental benefit?

 

What Do You Think?

Post a Comment

ktidid

January 7th, 2010 1:33 PM PT

This custom is spreading throughout the country, and is reasonable,so long as the profits go to local environmental needs. To insure this, it is my opinion that strict governmental monitoring be established to see that it is those needs which are met, not lining pockets of the sellers. And the profits might also, in part, be assigned to subsidize that regulation. I have a separate question: how do the plastic bags get into a river? If city/county trash collection is the cause that problem needs to be addressed just as strictly with substantial fines for non-compliance. And, finally, if there are individuals who do this directly, what about some kind of serious fine based on evidence,such as a photograph taken by an observer?

Post a Comment

Not a subscriber? Sign Up
 
 
*  
 




 

Get Stormwater E-mail Updates!

Get weekly news and updates through our Stormwater e-mail newsletter!